The Accounting Onion

Peeling away financial reporting issues one layer at a time.

  • Home
  • About
  • Training

Links

  • Click Here to Take the IFRS Opinion Survey!
  • My Website
  • Posts by Topic
  • Sample In-house Training Agendas
  • Welcome to the Accounting Onion
My Photo

Recent Posts

  • Merrily We Roll Along -- Forward and Up
  • Goodwill Impairment: I Love a Charade (Re-posted)
  • The FASB's Mission Incomprehensible
  • A Modest List of Financial Analysis 'Red Flags'
  • Making Revenue Recognition Simple and Informative
  • Going to School on Revenue Recognition
  • To Head in the Right Direction on IFRS, the SEC Should Make a U-Turn
  • Sarbanes-Oxley and Smaller Reporting Companies: There is a Better Way
  • And Our IFRS Survey Says…
  • The Speak-No-Evil FASB

Categories

  • Accounting Concepts
  • Auditing
  • Books
  • Business combinations
  • Commentary
  • Compensation, pensions and other benefits
  • Contingent Liabilities
  • Credit ratings
  • Current Affairs
  • EITF
  • Financial Analysis
  • Financial instruments
  • Foreign Operations
  • Intercorporate investments
  • Interest Costs
  • International
  • R&D
  • Recent Developments
  • Revenue Recognition
  • SEC
  • SOX

Credit Rating Agencies and Auditors Have Something in Common: Independence Problems

Sarah Johnson of CFO.com has written a nice summary of congressional concerns about the independence and role of credit rating agencies arising out of Enron and now, the subprime loan debacle. 

Accounting and finance researchers have documented in numerous studies that rating agencies consistently lag market assessments of credit quality that is reflected in securities prices.  Is the reason due to the conflicts of interest of the kind pointed out in the article, or that too much is expected of the rating agencies, even in the best of circumstances?  It is probably a little of both, so SEC investigations won't help to fix the problem--unless it leads them to undo the lucrative franchise they created for credit rating agencies in their own regulations.  At the very least, if credit assessments are provided to potential investors through SEC filings, they must come from experts that meet strict independence requirements.

But, as with auditors, it is impossible to be truly independent from the person who signs your paycheck, so maybe the SEC should hire the rating agency and pass on the cost to the issuer. Until then, the most reliable credit ratings will be ones that investors pay for themselves.

Posted on September 09, 2007 at 12:51 AM in Commentary, Credit ratings, Recent Developments | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Subscribe

  •  Subscribe in a reader

  • Add to Google Reader or Homepage

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

  • Subscribe in Bloglines

  • Or Subscribe via Email
    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Roll

  • 10Q Detective
  • 1440 Wall Street
  • AAO Weblog
  • Aleph Blog
  • CPA Blog
  • FEI Financial Reporting Blog
  • Re: The Auditors
  • Skeptical CPA
  • The Summa

Technorati Tools

  • Blog Information Profile for AccountingOnion